Debiased inverse-variance weighted estimator in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization
نویسندگان
چکیده
Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular approach to study the effect of modifiable exposure on an outcome by using genetic variants as instrumental variables. A challenge in MR is that each variant explains relatively small proportion variance and there are many such variants, setting known weak instruments. To this end, we provide theoretical characterization statistical properties two estimators MR: inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimator IVW with screened instruments independent selection dataset, under We then propose debiased estimator, simple modification robust does not require screening. Additionally, present instrument methods improve efficiency new when dataset available. An extension handle balanced horizontal pleiotropy also discussed. conclude demonstrating our results simulated real datasets.
منابع مشابه
A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two‐sample summary data Mendelian randomization
Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic data to probe questions of causality in epidemiological research, by invoking the Instrumental Variable (IV) assumptions. In recent years, it has become commonplace to attempt MR analyses by synthesising summary data estimates of genetic association gleaned from large and independent study populations. This is referred to as two-sample summary data MR. ...
متن کاملImproving the accuracy of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption
Two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization (MR) incorporating multiple genetic variants in a meta-analysis framework is a popular technique for assessing causality in epidemiology. If all genetic variants satisfy the instrumental variable (IV) assumptions, then their individual causal ratio estimates should be homogeneous. Observed heterogeneity, therefore, supports the notion that a porti...
متن کاملBias due to participant overlap in two‐sample Mendelian randomization
Mendelian randomization analyses are often performed using summarized data. The causal estimate from a one-sample analysis (in which data are taken from a single data source) with weak instrumental variables is biased in the direction of the observational association between the risk factor and outcome, whereas the estimate from a two-sample analysis (in which data on the risk factor and outcom...
متن کاملCommentary: Two-sample Mendelian randomization: opportunities and challenges
A et al. Body mass index and lung cancer risk: results from the ICARE study, a large, population-based case-control study. A et al. Stress decreases the ability to resist smoking and potentiates smoking intensity and reward. Anthropometric factors and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Association of oral contraceptive use,...
متن کاملConsistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator
Developments in genome-wide association studies and the increasing availability of summary genetic association data have made application of Mendelian randomization relatively straightforward. However, obtaining reliable results from a Mendelian randomization investigation remains problematic, as the conventional inverse-variance weighted method only gives consistent estimates if all of the gen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Statistics
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0090-5364', '2168-8966']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/20-aos2027